Maybe I'm missing something, but I'm not using Tomcat's servlet invoker. So I don't have a single 'some-string-here' (ie /servlet) that I can use. Or do I?
> -----Original Message----- > From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 11:00 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: possibly off topic: workers2.properties question > > > > Sure, that could be done, but I honestly don't see the value. > The only way > this is "better" or "easier" is if you have your servlets > spread out all > over the place. Otherwise, you can handle everything you > need with two > mappings: > > /app/*.jsp > /app/some-string-here/* > > Since Tomcat doesn't "do" anything with any other type of > file, and since > Apache is perfectly capable of handling every other file type > besides JSP > and servlet, what's the need for more functionality? I'm not > arguing, just > wondering what the advantage is. > > John > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:23:02 -0500, Mike Curwen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is something that's on the horizon for me, and I know > what I'll > > end up doing is using that automated method of configuring mod_jk. > > Tomcat will start and create a file that contains a > > uri:webappname/servletname mapping for each servlet mapped > in web.xml > > for all webapps. Then in apache, you just include this > file. But I've > > often thought it would be very cool to NOT have to do it > this way, and > > instead have a 'Not' type mapping from apache. In this > way, I could > > specify something like: > > > > [uri:!/app/images] > > and > > [uri:!/app/css] > > > > And then have everything *else* sent to Tomcat. > > > > Is this a huge pipe dream? Aside from the fact that this is not > > currently implemented, can anyone see anything theoretically or > > practically wrong with an approach such as this one? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mark Eggers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: > Tuesday, June > > 17, > > 2003 10:16 AM > > To: Tomcat Users List > > Subject: Re: possibly off topic: workers2.properties question > > > > > > Steve, > > > > You would single out what you wish to have Tomcat > > handle, and then Apache would handle the rest. > > > > For example: > > > > [uri:/app/*.jsp] > > worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 > > > > [uri:/app/servlet/*] > > worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 > > > > would send all files ending in .jsp and all files > > underneath the /app/servlet uri to Tomcat. Everything > > else underneath the /app uri would be served by > > Apache. > > > > Theoretically it is possible to be more fine-grained > > with perl-compatible regular expressions, but I've not experimented > > with this. > > > > HTH > > > > /mde/ > > just my two cents . . . . > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
