Rick,

On 3/27/24 09:22, Rick Noel wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2024 8:24 AM
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>; Rick Noel 
<rn...@westwoodone.com.INVALID>
Cc: Voodoo nmulcahy gmail <nmulc...@gmail.com>; David Jung 
<david.j...@cumulus.com>
Subject: [EXT]Re: performance tunning of Tomcat 10

Rick,

On 3/27/24 07:53, Rick Noel wrote:
I was wondering if the apache foundation has any tools we can use to
fine tune Tomcat 10. Tools to deteming how to set the best heap size
for Tomcat startup and the best connection attributes of
minSpareThreads and MaxThreads.
What is your goal?
Our application is a sip phone call handling application.(A voice response xml 
application)
The goal is to not have  call bottleneck at peak call volume.
Sometimes too many folks call at one time hit our app and calls are not handle 
correctly.

I know my application at times will reach 100 concurrent connections
  > and some times goes has high as 500 connections.

Okay.
Well I do not have actual traffic info down to the sec,
But from the application logs I know that that points in the day more than 300 
calls can come in

Okay, you need to get better information. Check out this presentation on Tomcat monitoring:

https://tomcat.apache.org/presentations.html#latest-monitoring-with-jmx

There is a lot in there, but I do talk about checking on the request processor to see how many requests are in-flight at once. You can do the same with your database pool.

You'll want to grab samples of those things at regular intervals to see how they correlate. I suspect you know when your peak times are, so schedule the samples to be taken during that timeframe. You could even sample once per second if you wanted to -- the calls are pretty inexpensive.

Should I boost minSpareThreads and maxThread values of what I plan to
use below? > Or why would we not just set very high minSpareThreads
and maxThread values like minSpareThreads =300  and maxThread=1000

This is a snippet of my server.xml

<Executor  name="tomcatPhoneAppThreadPool"  namePrefix="catalina-executor-"
                  minSpareThreads="50"
                    maxThreads="300"    />

        <Connector port="8585"
                       executor="tomcatPhoneAppThreadPool"
                       compression="on"
                       compressionMinSize="2048"
                       
compressableMimeType="text/html,text/xml,text/plain,text/css,text/javascript,application/javascript,application/json,application/xml"
                       protocol="org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol"
                                     redirectPort="8443">
                                         <UpgradeProtocol
className="org.apache.coyote.http2.Http2Protocol" />

           </Connector>

Also, am I good with setting  
protocol="org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol"
And then setting <UpgradeProtocol
className="org.apache.coyote.http2.Http2Protocol" />

That will tell Tomcat to do HTTP2 Correct?

That's the only way to enable h2. Well... you could use Http11Nio2Protocol, 
too. NIO is the default protocol so you don't even need to add that 
specifically if you don't want to.

Back to threads.

Each thread (unless you go virtual, but that's not really production-ready IMHO at this 
point unless you have very strict circumstances where it will work great for you) takes 
up a bunch of memory, so you can't just set maxThreads=1M. Threads take "time" 
to start, but it's not really that much. If starting and stopping threads is what is 
making your application slow, than you have a very high-performance application and 
environment indeed.

Your question as stated is unanswerable.

You say you are sometimes hitting 500 connections. The default maximum number of 
connections is 10000 and you are only using 500. That means you aren't being flooded, 
which is a Good Thing. (BTW: How are you measuring "how many connections" you 
have? Make sure you are measuring the right thing...

I am estimating the actual connections just based on application call logs.

Is your *current* maxThreads set to 500? If so, then your thread pool maximum 
is set to your high-water mark which seems like it should be fine. If you set 
your maxThreads to 1000 you won't get any benefit because only 500 requests are 
ever being sent at once, right?

What else does your application do?
Our application is a sip phone call handling application.(A voice response xml 
application)

For example, if you have a thread-pool max-threads of 1000 and your application 
uses an RDBMS for every request but your db connection pool size is more like 
10, then many threads waiting on a small number of connections gets you 
absolutely no benefit. You'd have to make changes elsewhere in your application 
in order to make use of those extra threads.

Similarly, if you have a big thread pool and a big db connection pool, but your 
database performs slowly, then having all that power on the application server 
doesn't really help you.

Yes our app is using a database  (we use Postres)
And yes I assume that is our bottleneck
Our tomcat context.xml defines that database maxConnction to be only 
maxTotal="20"

So if you are allowing up to 300 or 500 threads and most of them need a database connection, then you are really limiting yourself to more like 20 simultaneous requests served.

You will likely need to increase that db connection pool size.

We have other apps  and that hit this same database, so we define low maxTotal  
on each  server so each server can have only limit connection access to the 
database

Well...

I am thinkingit would be best to try and NOT optimize  minSpareThreads and 
maxThreads but instead to determine what is the optimal
Database  connection maxTotal to set

I agree. And if your database can't handle it, then you need to invest more $$$ in your database, or re-think how to store data.

One way to re-think things is to consider replication/clustering of your existing database. I'm not super familiar with PostgreSQL but I suspect you can use multi-primary deployments and read-only replicas as long as your application understands how to interact properly with that kind of deployment.

Another option would be to use a different kind of database like Cassandra or whatever which is optimized for writes (if you are write-heavy). You might also be able to segment your data differently, so information about current in-progress calls goes to a high-performance but small database (possibly in-memory) and longer-term storage can be used for things that need to out-last the phone call such as statistics and stuff like that.

So anyone trying to answer "how big should be thread pool be" really needs to 
understand the nature of your application and the other things happening in your 
environment.

Sometimes the answer is "just add more threads/CPUs/memory" and sometimes the answer is 
"re-think your application architecture".

-chris


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to