psss I added some YouTube info in the history timeline. YouTube is the biggest thing to happen to videoblogging ever ever ever ever. There should be a whole section on it, but a YouTuber should write it, not me.
On 4/30/07, Adam Quirk, Wreck & Salvage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've signed up, and I'll try to watch it again. > > There was a time, when I was so broken hearted, love wasn't much of a > friend of mine. The tables have turned, yeah, cause me and them ways have > parted, that kind of love was the killin' kind. > > Sorry, I wrote "there was a time" and Aerosmith just started spewing out > all over the place. > > Anyhow, the entry has been the heart of some virile dispute in the past. > I don't think the collective "we" should be policing it to ensure it's > homogenous with this group, but I do think we should all edit add/subtract > as we see fit, whenever we desire. > > For example, right now I'm going to remove the V tech stuff. Not really > vlogging-related. Also going to remove the Vloggies reference, as that was > an awards show (self-congratulatory bs is not covered in the charter) > sponsored by a company, and not directly related to the definition of > videoblogging by any means. > > ps I think Irina et al are good peoples, but I have serious concerns with > the idea of an awards show for videoblogging. They're pretentious and > pointless, and belong on the wall of real estate offices, as Seinfeld said > earlier this year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_OqvUbBNA4 > > pss There's only 2 mentions of YouTube in the entire entry, and they are > in passing. Pretty insular. > > On 4/30/07, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > Yeah, what if he's the Wikipedia version of Uma Thurman in Kill Bill, > > and we're the Crazy 88? > > > > Bring it on. Sign up to Watch the Vlog definition article if you > > can, and use your own judgement to see whether the changes you see > > are right, whoever makes them. > > > > I can see how you could get tired of it, Tom, but too many people - > > particularly media people - will continue use Wikipedia as a starting > > point, and it's important that vlogging is correctly represented > > there, not repeatedly vandalised by some random fool. > > > > If we keep up an honest watch of it, sooner of later he'll want to > > find somewhere else to play. > > > > I added a little something about the definition of vlogging, with > > reference to Winer, Cho, YouTube. I think it's reasonably on track, > > but I've never edited Wikipedia before, only consumed in large > > quantities. Don't mind it being changed/removed by rational people, > > of course. > > > > Rupert > > > > On 30 Apr 2007, at 12:15, Adrian Miles wrote: > > > > > around the 30/4/07 Jan McLaughlin mentioned about [videoblogging] Re: > > > Video Blog Wikipedia Entry that: > > > >I just reinstated MMeiser's previous version. > > > > > > > >Make a minor edit and sign up to "watch" the page. > > > > > > have done so, I guess if enough of us do this then it either becomes > > > some weird escalated battle or he gives in? > > > -- > > > cheers > > > Adrian Miles > > > this email is bloggable [ ] ask first [ ] private [x] > > > vogmae.net.au > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Adam Quirk > Wreck & Salvage > 551.208.4644 > Brooklyn, NY > http://wreckandsalvage.com -- Adam Quirk Wreck & Salvage 551.208.4644 Brooklyn, NY http://wreckandsalvage.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
