Hey everyone, I seem to be the topic of conversation today. I'm going to ignore the negative messages because I think it's great that there's renewed interest in the article. The great thing about wikipedia is everyone can edit it. Thereâs one catch though, itâs an encyclopedia which means the content must be encyclopedic.
In regards to the vlog article, this means that everything we put into it has to be from a reliable source like a news article. (i.e. not blogs) Thereâs already sourced content contributed by Steve Garfield, Michael Meiser and myself in the article and I invite everyone else to contribute. Patrick D p.s. Sorry if I posted this twice. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Jan McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has rather been decimated. > > Wow. > > Anybody? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlog > > Jan > > -- > The Faux Press - better than real > http://fauxpress.blogspot.com > http://twitter.com/fauxpress > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
