I've signed up, and I'll try to watch it again. There was a time, when I was so broken hearted, love wasn't much of a friend of mine. The tables have turned, yeah, cause me and them ways have parted, that kind of love was the killin' kind.
Sorry, I wrote "there was a time" and Aerosmith just started spewing out all over the place. Anyhow, the entry has been the heart of some virile dispute in the past. I don't think the collective "we" should be policing it to ensure it's homogenous with this group, but I do think we should all edit add/subtract as we see fit, whenever we desire. For example, right now I'm going to remove the V tech stuff. Not really vlogging-related. Also going to remove the Vloggies reference, as that was an awards show (self-congratulatory bs is not covered in the charter) sponsored by a company, and not directly related to the definition of videoblogging by any means. ps I think Irina et al are good peoples, but I have serious concerns with the idea of an awards show for videoblogging. They're pretentious and pointless, and belong on the wall of real estate offices, as Seinfeld said earlier this year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_OqvUbBNA4 pss There's only 2 mentions of YouTube in the entire entry, and they are in passing. Pretty insular. On 4/30/07, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, what if he's the Wikipedia version of Uma Thurman in Kill Bill, > and we're the Crazy 88? > > Bring it on. Sign up to Watch the Vlog definition article if you > can, and use your own judgement to see whether the changes you see > are right, whoever makes them. > > I can see how you could get tired of it, Tom, but too many people - > particularly media people - will continue use Wikipedia as a starting > point, and it's important that vlogging is correctly represented > there, not repeatedly vandalised by some random fool. > > If we keep up an honest watch of it, sooner of later he'll want to > find somewhere else to play. > > I added a little something about the definition of vlogging, with > reference to Winer, Cho, YouTube. I think it's reasonably on track, > but I've never edited Wikipedia before, only consumed in large > quantities. Don't mind it being changed/removed by rational people, > of course. > > Rupert > > On 30 Apr 2007, at 12:15, Adrian Miles wrote: > > > around the 30/4/07 Jan McLaughlin mentioned about [videoblogging] Re: > > Video Blog Wikipedia Entry that: > > >I just reinstated MMeiser's previous version. > > > > > >Make a minor edit and sign up to "watch" the page. > > > > have done so, I guess if enough of us do this then it either becomes > > some weird escalated battle or he gives in? > > -- > > cheers > > Adrian Miles > > this email is bloggable [ ] ask first [ ] private [x] > > vogmae.net.au > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > -- Adam Quirk Wreck & Salvage 551.208.4644 Brooklyn, NY http://wreckandsalvage.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
