On 05.03.2024 16:15, Oleksii wrote: > I agree that upon examining the current state of the code around these > functions, it appears safe to provide stubs. However, the reason my > patch was rejected is that it may not be entirely safe, as Julien > pointed out that even with Arm, some functions shouldn't be empty. > > What I would like to propose is that it might be beneficial, at least > in CONFIG_DEBUG=y, to have a warning message. Does that make sense?
A warning message to what effect? And are you thinking of a build-time warning, or a runtime one? Plus wouldn't different aspects quickly lead to proliferation of warnings? Jan
