> That is probably a bug. That should probably be just ">" since I > don't > see anywhere where we ever place anything in that last entry.
I will double check this. > Exactly, this falls more under the realm of "we're creating a new API > and even though it is only currently used by TransformHelper and we > know how that works, we should consider that this API might get re-used in > the future in other cases". This is not a pure new API since it is not public and can be used by our pipe package only, I'll add warning about this in javadoc. Moreover this code have a big impact(hundreds percents) on the performance of drawing, I consider we should return region from the TransformHelper directly in the future(or we should change format of edges array to the bands array format). I do not see that we do a lot of calculations at the native level in the TransformHelper.calculateEdges() so it should be possible, I think....
