On 02/19/2015 11:35 AM, dalibor topic wrote: > On 15.02.2015 13:39, Laurent Bourgès wrote: >> Mario & andrews, >> >> Thanks for your prompt answers. >> >> > I agree with Andrew, getting the JEP proposed is the minimum >> > requirement to get this work unstuck. >> >> Ok, so it is the way to go. >> > > I don't think that filing JEPs for code that isn't part of an OpenJDK > Project makes a lot of sense. > > The first step would be to find a suitable home for such code within an > existing OpenJDK Project, or to form a new one. A potentially suitable > home could be [0], for example, if (and only if) everyone involved agrees.
Please explain what this is for. We have a bunch of patches which work well. Is it your opinion that we need a separate staging and testing area for this upgrade? It was not developed as part of an OpenJDK project, that is true. But there's no reason why people can't review the patches. Andrew.
