On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 17:34:43 GMT, Phil Race <p...@openjdk.org> wrote: >> Marked as reviewed by prr (Reviewer). > > Approved. > Whilst the fix looks reasonable and important for on-screen, I am surprised > it was an issue when printing. > At *printer resolution* it is really surprising that there are any bitmaps > for the glyphs. > We should be talking about a 300 dpi printer minimum these days and so we > should be requesting at least 50 pixel > high text for even 12pt nomimal size. Fonts usually don't have bitmaps at > that size because they are large and less important. > So I am not sure under what circumstances you saw it. > > Secondly, I think that unless we were going down the raster path (which I > think you said we were) that we normally explicitly used filled shapes for > CJK.
The testing is in progress. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1218