On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 17:34:43 GMT, Phil Race <p...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Marked as reviewed by prr (Reviewer).
>
> Approved.
> Whilst the fix looks reasonable and important for on-screen, I am surprised 
> it was an issue when printing.
> At *printer resolution* it is really surprising that there are any bitmaps 
> for the glyphs.
> We should be talking about a 300 dpi printer minimum these days and so we 
> should be requesting at least 50 pixel
> high text for even 12pt nomimal size. Fonts usually don't have bitmaps at 
> that size because they are large  and less important.
> So I am not sure under what circumstances you saw it.
> 
> Secondly, I think that unless we were going down the raster path (which I 
> think you said we were) that we normally explicitly used filled shapes for 
> CJK.

The testing is in progress.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1218

Reply via email to