hehehe i think twerk woundnt be happy u calling his style tech-house(not having a go here dont flame) He thinks alot of people who want to make funky tracks resort to tech-house rather then just doing 'funky techno' i've seen his tracks get slower over the past few years but its still very expermental him kit clayton and sutekh and i think stewart does to along with alot of the german producers use granulor synthesis(kit help program msp which they all use which does this type of thing but its mac only =/) also monolake are involved with a program call reaktor which does it to maybe twerk will post and explain this better ----- Original Message ----- From: tristan watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2000 6:03 PM Subject: [313] Pops 'n clicks in Tech-house
> Having heard a number of what I would call > pop-'n-clicky tech-house tracks > at the local shoppe yesterday, it occured to me that > this style (think > Sutekh's periods.make.sense, some twerk, some John > Tejada, maybe even > Theorem vs. Stewart Walker) reminds me of an > "integrated" Thomas Brinkmann, > more straight forward but still embracing that > Brinkmann (or even Pole) > quirkiness. > > Thoughts? > > Tristan > ========================================== > PHONOPSIA<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/Lounge/5102 > "FrogboyMCI" on AOL Instant Messenger > > New Album, "Québécois", online now. > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! > http://mail.yahoo.com/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
