an alternative view: maybe "new" and "model 500" seem like they
shouldn't go together?

while some may not love this newest metroplex, for people to say this
doesn't sound like detroit techno, 1) does it matter to you what the
guy whose style detroit techno is thinks ??? 2) perhaps sounds more
techno to mine ear than certain of the latest transmats...

in any case... all the feedback i read makes me think: "womp, womp".

and for anything a little more like listening music or experimental
not to be detroit techno... ridiculous and retarded are words that
come to mind when trying to describe that point of view.






On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Patrick Wacher <pwac...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was kind of hoping that Metroplex would come out strong with a new
> Model 500 or something?
>
> P.
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:54 AM, ohanakin ... <ohana...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> not something you recognize as close to detroit techno ? hmm...
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:19 PM, kent williams <chaircrus...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> It doesn't sound like Detroit Techno.  It's closer to some of the more
>>> experimental stuff at the fringes of dance music. It isn't bad, per
>>> se, it just doesn't have that immediate emotional hook.
>>>
>>> I try my own work, to try to find rhythms I find compelling and
>>> combine that with tonal material that has some emotional resonance for
>>> me personally.  Whether or not I succeed with respect to others is an
>>> open question, but that is what I'm trying.
>>>
>>> In contrast there's a whole world of music out there that combines
>>> repetitive beats with what sounds to me like academic electro-acoustic
>>> music.  That is not the way to get people runway-jacking on the New
>>> Dance Show, but I don't reject it out of hand.  I like some of that
>>> stuff a lot -- Pansonic, the stuff on Taylor Dupree's 12K label, tim
>>> hecker...
>>>
>>> But it's not something I recognize as being anywhere close to Detroit 
>>> Techno.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Kevin Kennedy <the...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> kent, you are being very nice...I am proud of you.  I am reserving all
>>>> comment about this recording.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to