are there any tracks for the next drexciya comp listed someplace?
On Dec 14, 2011, at 12:08 PM, Patrick Wacher wrote: > No argument from me :) > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Fred Heutte <ph...@sunlightdata.com> wrote: >> I'll tell you what, not that this is news to anyone, but Ron Murphy >> was a wizard. I give you Exhibit A: Wavejumper. >> >> fh >> >> ----------------- >>> Great point about the mastering perhaps giving a more consistent >>> quality, Emile... >>> >>> I hadn't been so interested in actually listening to the comp, since I >>> know it all already, until you guys reminded me about the >>> remastering...It'll be interesting to hear how esp. certain tracks >>> might sound better/different -- Wavejumper & The Countdown Has Begun >>> come to mind off the top of my head, the 909 in the originals is so >>> punchy and I think that record is kinda crusty, in a good way and in a >>> bad way... >>> >>> I think some stuff could really benefit in some ways but maybe others >>> might lose some specialness, even if they sound technically better, >>> I'm pretty curious now...Especially I think where Ron Murphy was >>> involved, it'll be interesting to hear the difference because it's >>> bound to be pretty different...Everything he mastered (like >>> Wavejumper/UR-030) had his touch, a bit of wildness that fit the music >>> so well..On the other hand, it wasn't always a 100% success...;) >>> >>> jt >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Emile Facey <em...@bleep43.com> wrote: >>>> As Marsel says, it'll depend on what Alden Tyrell has done in his mastering >>>> process, and if it's to your taste. Mastering techniques have definitely >>>> come a long way since some of this stuff was released originally but not >>>> everyone will agree that they've got better. He's normally a really good >>>> engineer though and the clips sound great to me. >>>> >>>> One thing that might be interesting is that remastering everything in one >>>> session from the original tapes might give the tracks a more consistent >>>> sound. I don't know for sure but I'd imagine that because a lot of them >>>> were >>>> released on different labels, most of these 12"s were mastered by different >>>> engineers at different cutting sessions and that as a result all the >>>> records >>>> sound a bit different, well at least to my ears, they do. >>>> >>>> 07 UNKNOWN JOURNEY is definitely something I've never heard before or seen >>>> on any original releases. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7 Dec 2011, at 09:48, Marsel van der Wielen wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> well, mastering is meant to have it sound better :-) >>>>> >>>>> but it's always personal judgement if it does of course >>>>> and can depend on which system the music is played after (home headphones >>>>> vs 100k stadium) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Op 7-12-2011 10:45, Placid schreef: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> all re-mastered - >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> A quick question. Does remastering actually man its going to sound >>>>>> better. What if the technique they use isn't as good as it originally >>>>>> was.... >>>>>> >>>>>> Going back to a post a few months back on how the trax stuff had been >>>>>> remastered to sound great on big sound systems but lacked mids and hi end >>>>>> clarity >>>>>> >>>>>> here - http://www.offmodern.com/2011/06/revisionist-house/ >>>>>> >>>>>> just thinking... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>
