all those who dont see "whats techno about Strings of Life?" please form a line before the firing squad.
Detroit techno comes on so many flavors and draws from so many inspirations that it's impossible to define it with any one sound or any one artist (hell, even that one artists work will jump numerous genres in the space of one album). so when does a "techno artist" cross that line and is considered to be no longer in the techno realm? Look at the Detroit 11 Phases compilation on Sublime. there are a few tracks on there that I feel would not be out of place on a traditional Detroit "techno" album. sean -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 9:33 AM To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: [313] what is electro, now s.o.l.? Maybe "Future" (Model 500) might have been even better. Dan Sicko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04/18/2001 12:09:45 PM To: "Ryan Brogan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <313@hyperreal.org> cc: Subject: RE: [313] what is electro, now s.o.l.? that is a tough one to argue. Maybe "Nude Photo" would have been a better example ... -d At 9:01 AM -0400 4/18/2001, Ryan Brogan wrote: > > > Strings of Life-techno > >I disagree. A house beat, piano and strings. What's techno about that? > >Personally, I think categories are for library books, but for the sake of >argument... > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
