On Sun, 13 May 2001, Jeffrey Paul wrote: > At 01:20 AM 5/13/2001, Lester Kenyatta Spence wrote: > How do we know they didn't catch him spending festival funds on a > transvestite hooker and decided to fire him politely rather than making a > scene?
We do not know. > I can see how the default, knee-jerk reaction to something like this would > be to "take a stand", but by our own admission, we've no idea any of the > facts of the situation. Taking a stand on a situation that you know > nothing of seems kind of pointless to me. No...the default position would be to stay seated. > I say let the facts be found out. I think this is an excellent point...but not one that is necessarily opposed to my position. I don't think the DEMF is about Carl the individual, but rather about what we call "the underground" broadly speaking. Let's say FOR THE PURPOSES OF DISCUSSION that Carl stole money and sabotaged the event. Does this mean that the committee that will replace him is going to stand by what we think of as "our" interests? At the very least, the tactic I propose can possibly lead to a committee that isn't filled with Ford hacks....... peace lks --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
