amen!!! On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, glyn wrote:
> "Grammenos, Peter" wrote: > > > That is a blatant rip off, period! Tracks feel the same, sound the same, and > > probably use the use the same production techniques ! [ one can never be > > certain ]. How lame, especially for a producer like wink who has been in the > > business for this long. But then again, he isn't the first producer to do > > this... > > you know, i didn't see the similarity between the other bell mp3 that was > posted > a couple of weeks ago, but thought i would give him the benefit of the doubt > until i heard this current that was posted on forcefield. having checked now > it out, i think it's fairly evident that the tracks have different drum sounds > and programming, different main monosynth lines, and really different-sounding > vocal samples/effects treatments of "freak" (in all honesty, i think wink > does a > lot more with the latter than bell). sure it sounds and feels "like" bell > (and > also like robert hood-- especially the monosynth line), but a *lot* of techno > tracks sound and feel "like" other techno tracks. if wink owes bell anything > over this then samuel l. sessions and every second hard techno producer after > about 1998 or so should be making monthly payments to jeff mills, the > deepchord > guys should have already sold their firstborns to the hardwax crew, and every > halfwit who ever lays hand on a tb-303 with the intent of making squelchy > noises > should write a cheque to dj pierre & spanky, etc. etc. etc. the argument here > seems to me to stem more from a dislike for wink and his previous trashy rave > anthems more than it does from any real musical analysis. > > glyn > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
