i can't even begin to imagine how many tracks have the word freak in them. wanna start a list?
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Grammenos, Peter wrote: > > just tell me this then, why on earth would he call is superfreak? in my > opinion it's because he's taken freak [ from '92 ] and applied new > production techniques/equipment to the original idea... give dan bell some > credit, at a minimum the inspiration for the name/voice sample. i don't know > of any tracks that use the same exact word/phrase on a track that sound as > similar as these two do and also have similar titles. > > -pete > > > -----Original Message----- > From: glyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:36 PM > Cc: 313@hyperreal.org > Subject: Re: [313] bell vs wink / forcefield > > > "Grammenos, Peter" wrote: > > > That is a blatant rip off, period! Tracks feel the same, sound the same, > and > > probably use the use the same production techniques ! [ one can never be > > certain ]. How lame, especially for a producer like wink who has been in > the > > business for this long. But then again, he isn't the first producer to do > > this... > > you know, i didn't see the similarity between the other bell mp3 that was > posted > a couple of weeks ago, but thought i would give him the benefit of the doubt > until i heard this current that was posted on forcefield. having checked > now > it out, i think it's fairly evident that the tracks have different drum > sounds > and programming, different main monosynth lines, and really > different-sounding > vocal samples/effects treatments of "freak" (in all honesty, i think wink > does a > lot more with the latter than bell). sure it sounds and feels "like" bell > (and > also like robert hood-- especially the monosynth line), but a *lot* of > techno > tracks sound and feel "like" other techno tracks. if wink owes bell > anything > over this then samuel l. sessions and every second hard techno producer > after > about 1998 or so should be making monthly payments to jeff mills, the > deepchord > guys should have already sold their firstborns to the hardwax crew, and > every > halfwit who ever lays hand on a tb-303 with the intent of making squelchy > noises > should write a cheque to dj pierre & spanky, etc. etc. etc. the argument > here > seems to me to stem more from a dislike for wink and his previous trashy > rave > anthems more than it does from any real musical analysis. > > glyn > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
