>Frequencies outside the audible range in analog *do* have an effect on >sounds we can hear. In signal processing, it's called the >modulation theory. >The digital counterpart is called aliasing. Both require >fairly technical >explanations, but amount to this - "inaudible frequencies can make >themselves heard".
Surely this is only at twice the audible frequency ? We cannot physically hear 44KHz sound but we sample at that rate because its the nyquist value of 22KHz which is the upper bound of our frequency range ? Assuming that (as previously mentioned) the frequency response of vinyl will not provide a constant gain across the entire spectrum then it seems reasonable to assume that a digital source of sufficient sampling rate can replicate vinyl with no audible difference ?? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]