>how does a small listener base translate into higher quality? The two aren't logically connected.
It's not a thought based on #'s, but more so on "survival of the fittest". But I don't have time to explain... Ya know what I mean! ...but it's something we could debate FOREVER, so.... -----Original Message----- From: Dennis DeSantis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 1:30 PM To: 313 Detroit Subject: Re: (313) heads-only techno? nah Darren Longton (Marketing) wrote: > Personally, I think that keeping things the way they are is one way to keep > some quality control on things. By imposing "quality control" requirements on a nebulous and intangible group like a whole community, you shift the responsibility away from the individual artists and listeners, who can probably better make quality judgements for themselves. Furthermore, how does a small listener base translate into higher quality? The two aren't logically connected. -- Dennis DeSantis www.dennisdesantis.com
