I think they mean in terms of impacting on pop culture in the US in the same
way.

----------
>From: spw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: (313) heads-only techno? nah
>Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 5:11 AM
>

> What ever gave people the impression that techno has even the slightest
> chance
> of becoming the next hip hop?
> I must not be in an alternate dimension.
>
> on 5/5/03 10:24 AM, Lester Kenyatta Spence at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 5 May 2003, Darren Longton (Marketing) wrote:
>>
>>> ooooo....don't think that'll go over well with the heads in detroit.
>>> Don't want to get into the whole elitism thing again, but....guess heads
>>> will have to except that our "underground scene" will eventually be a
>>> POP-MTV-CEO controlled genre....if it becomes the next hip hop.  I
>>> mean...I LOVE hiphop...but it's getting a little too...well...MTV!!
>>
>> I think what Kent is referring to is the mass support that hiphop receives
>> on the radio, on tours, on television, and the like.
>>
>>> Personally, I think that keeping things the way they are is one way to
>>> keep some quality control on things.  After all...a lot of hiphop is
>>> ABOUT the $$...can't think of any techno that is....well...MAYBE
>>> GhettoTek....but that's more about THAT ASS!!!  haha
>>
>> This is where the comparisons end, largely because much of techno is
>> instrumental.  Delivery, Flow, Rhythmic complexity, all have undoubtedly
>> improved in rap music...and part of that is because more people listen and
>> participate in it.  The thing that has dried up is content.  Rap played on
>> popular radio stations isn't really saying much.  I attribute this to the
>> political economy of popular music.
>>
>> Because the emphasis in techno is not on lyrics--again MOST of techno is
>> instrumental--I think that if techno did become as strong as hiphop in the
>> states we'd get all of the benefits (as far as growth of the artform)
>> without the detriments (content that is arguably vulgar and
>> spirit-killing).  I'd make the same argument for house, even though there
>> is a strong lyrical component to it.  You just can't sing about Benzes the
>> way you can about unrequited love, or about worship.
>>
>>
>> lks
> 

Reply via email to