Uh-huh, here we go again... I can't wait to read the debates when everyone learns that he has Fleetwood Mac on his forthcoming Choice CD on Azuli. Ooops. ;)))
---------- >From: "Robert Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Brendan Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ken Odeluga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "313" <313@hyperreal.org> >Subject: RE: (313) Mills >Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:12 PM > > I still fail to see the point of the DVD thing. Either I'm stupid, or > Mills' explanation for it is rubbish. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brendan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 12:07 PM > To: Ken Odeluga; 313 > Subject: RE: (313) Mills > > > While Saunderson was better than I expected, it didn't really blow me away > and like a few other people I was a bit confused as to why Mills came on so > late - which meant that I was getting unfairly impatient towards the end of > Saunderson's set. It was effective and crowd-pleasing but nothing > ground-breaking really. > > I was really impressed by Mills, though, I have to say. Maybe it's because > it's a while since I've seen him, or because I was swept up in the spirit > of the night, but he seemed to me to be very assured and on-form, and he > played quite a lot of tracks that I hadn't heard before but that were > pretty intriguing; the 909 stuff was pretty rude as well. And even though I > know this is serious flamebait, I actually think the DVD thing at the start > worked... *duck!* > > One of the things I worry about sometimes is that the world of techno will > hit a point where all new music is basically schranz and if a DJ is going > to really rock the crowd he/she will have to basically play ancient > classics. Periodically, though, you hear a set that helps to persuade you > that there's still development and evolution of the sound going on > (Surgeon's set at Turnmills a few weeks back sounded like just that sort of > thing actually). So yeah, I thought Mills did a really good job and he did > exceed my expectations in all honesty. The 2001 stuff was nice visual > dressing but I'm not so much of a "visuals" man and didn't really notice it > being "soundtracked" in any particular way... was nice to look at though! > > Brendan > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ken Odeluga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: 01 March 2004 11:56 >> To: Brendan Nelson; 313 >> Subject: RE: (313) Mills >> >> >> Well what did we all think of Lost then? Especially Mills and >> Saunderson. >> Come on, let's 'ave opinions ... >> >> k >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Brendan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 11:45 AM >> >To: 313 >> >Subject: RE: (313) Mills >> > >> > >> >Yeah, it was a pretty surreal moment on Saturday when I saw that >> >in the magazine! I was on the lookout for a bunch of Absolutely >> >Fabulous-style fashion journos looking out of their depth at Lost, >> >but without success... >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Tom Churchill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Sent: 01 March 2004 11:47 >> >> To: 313 >> >> Subject: (313) Mills >> >> >> >> >> >> Did anyone other UK list-members spot the Jeff Mills mention >> >> in the fashion >> >> pages of the Guardian's Weekend magazine on Saturday? >> Quite amusing: >> >> >> >> http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,3605,1156729,00.html >> >> >> >> >> > >> > > ############################################################################ ######### > > Note: > > Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily > represent > those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. > This email > and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of the > individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this > email in > error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thank You. > ############################################################################ ######### > >
