;0) The bit I thought was ludicrous was the bit where anything that isn't 313 derived is not classed as techno.
-----Original Message----- From: Brendan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 March 2004 1:41 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) what is Detroit techno ... No it's not! You haven't seen some of my posts from the mid-nineties... ;-) There used to be a time when there was no real distinction between "trance" and "techno" - "trancey" was an adjective people sometimes used, but it could apply to tracks by the likes of Richie Hawtin as much as tracks from European producers. It was only in the early nineties that I came across people referring to "trance" as a standalone type of music, distinct from "techno". All I'm saying is that this process could end up repeating itself; and that, if it did, one of the most obvious schisms that could take place might be the complete splitting off of "schranz" from "techno" in terms of how people talk about music. I don't reckon that's very ludicrous - or at least not by my standards anyway! Brendan > -----Original Message----- > From: Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 23 March 2004 13:37 > To: Brendan Nelson; Andrew; 313@hyperreal.org > Subject: RE: (313) what is Detroit techno ... > > > "I'd quite like it if one day all the looped-banger stuff was just > known as "schranz", and the word "techno" became widely accepted > as referring mainly to 313-derived stuff... similar to what happened > with trance when it split off from techno." > > > That's the most ludicrous thing you've ever typed!!!!! *************************************************************************************** Opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not Entergy-Koch Trading Limited or its affiliated companies. This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not listed on the "To" or "Cc" lines of the original email (or are not the person responsible for delivering to an intended recipient), then you are not an intended recipient and have received this email in error. Any use by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the IT manager by telephone on +44 (0)20 7337 8300 or via email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], attaching this message. Please then delete this email and all attachments, and destroy any copies thereof. Thank you. ***************************************************************************************
