ronny>>face it, you're living a longtime relationship with the things you know, >that's why they appear old, used or even boring to you. time to change >the point of view maybe?
well, maybe. but the point is, all I hear is badly recycled ideas. and worse, this seems to be acceptable for some reason. take Matthew Herbert. how many times have I read that this man is pushing electronic music to new levels, taking it one step further. what? by recycling 60 year old songs, adding a few of his own and standing infront of it all sampling a balloon? is this the 'future'? the 'hip' crowd obviously had read that it was. or that band Spektrum. Great band. I keep reading they're the hottest new thing. I think they sound great, but lets face it, that could have been made 20 years ago without looking too deeply into it. I dunno. there's tons of great new underground music about at the minute, and I don't why I moan, perhaps I just want an argument. Of course you have to look to the past to gain inspiration, but for f**ks sake, I think it's gone way too far. It's like my mate who I swear to god hasn't bought a record that was made past 1986 in the last 3 years. he dj's out too, and he's good, but flippin eck, I don't think I can live with it any more, it bores me. so there. Alex *I'm getting me a spacesuit* _________________________________________________________________ --------------------- End of message text -------------------- This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers. PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring
