What's wrong with "Electric Avenue"? This snobby purist thing is starting to get to me. I think you all forget that DJs have to sometimes play stuff that ordinary people relate to, their job is to rock the crowd, so what if they play something you think is cheesy once in a while? It's not the same as playing a set full of cheesy stuff. I mean, we're talking about "pop-art" here, it's not the same as a performance where people are just listening and nodding their heads.
That being said, I don't want to hear Briteny Spears or Justin Timberlake, personally. But you people seem to be taking this too seriously. I guess it just makes everyone sound really whiney to try and discuss the WORST record you can think of a DJ playing. More to the point, it's really subjective, I'd be more interested in whether the crowd reacted poorly. THAT would say something more objective or interesting about the subject. ~David ---------- Original Message ------------- Subject: RE: (313) Kevin Saunderson & Carl Craig last weekend in London Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 11:03:12 -0400 From: Ben Britz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] stacey pullen - phats and small "respect the cock" at motor in 2001. 4 hours a stunning techno and chicago house, then THAT?!?!?! also acquaviva playing "electric avenue" at the demf a few years ago, but he's neither a legend nor a favorite. but it was really, really bad Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > Brendan>Kenny Larkin, despite playing a very good set overall, > dropped one > or > >tracks in Liverpool a few months back that were so bad I had to > >walk off the dancefloor. The problem is, I don't remember what > they > >were... > > I remember very little from that night..! > > But, while we're on the subject of Kenny Larkin in Liverpool. > > Was he just playing records that night? I'm sure he had a re-edit > of Never > On Sunday "Journey" > (or he was being clever with an fx box). or was he playing cd's > or with a > lap-top? > anyone else seen him on his 'tour'? > > Scott - can you remember? or anyone....? > > Alex > _________________________________________________________________ > > --------------------- End of message text -------------------- > > This e-mail is sent by the above named in their > individual, non-business capacity and is not on > behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers. > > PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming > e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and > telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you > give your consent to such monitoring > > >
