Question. With all this talk about what you'd pay for a record, is there a
resource in print or online, like Goldmine, that would place a value? Or is
this just a totally underground territory? Where does one place $300 value
on a record in this genre?

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 10:28:58 -0400 (EDT)
> To: Toby Frith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ken Odeluga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> placid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: RE: (313) Re: what's the most people are willing to pay for rekkids?
> 
> I'm not sure of the media "deteriorating" per se, but I will give a short
> description of popular methods of CD-R and CD-RW techniques.  Basically,
> we're dealing with teh same sort of principle as vinyl, accept the laser
> in a CD player or CD rom is reflected off of the reflective material in
> the CD that is different heights and widths (although it's read a bit
> differently than on vinyl [from what i hear - this is the part i'm not so
> familiar with]).  The "burning" process actually involves the CD "burner"
> hitting a recordable CD that has a reflective material with dye on it.
> This dye is manipulated by the laser so that can make the pits and grooves
> (although extremely small) so that it can be read by another.  I would
> assume that if this dye is cheap enough (or in some cases the actual metal
> film is in itself manipulated by the laser) it could be concluded that
> over use the "normal" type laser could affect the pits and grooves and
> therefore affect the sound.  I've not heard of this, tho, so I won't try
> to substantiate or disprove.
> 
> cheers,
> dense
> 
> On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Toby Frith wrote:
>> 
>> Interesting point about file retention. I read somewhere that a lot of
> cheaper CD-Rs only last for about 2 - 3 years
> before the quality slowly disintegrates.
> Not sure how, but I'm sure some tech
> people could source that. I mean,
> how much would you pay for a hard drive of say,
> 100 gigs worth of music
> that in essence could be duplicated in a very short time?
> 

Reply via email to