Blade Runner?

.... By the way, if anyone's heard the UR62 promo and cares to post some
comments they would be much appreciated. It seems to be creating a quiet
little stir ...

k

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 10:00 AM
>To: Robert Taylor; matrix313; Cyclone Wehner; 313 Detroit
>Subject: RE: (313) Techno Films
>
>
>on the technical side maybe but for the story line I can't see how
>it compares with the A-Team.....you crazy fool :)
>
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       Sent: Mon 16/08/2004 10:53
>       To: matrix313; Cyclone Wehner; 313 Detroit
>       Cc:
>       Subject: RE: (313) Techno Films
>
>
>
>       Android is a proper techno film, as are The Terminator
>films (T3 excepted) - the only robot films that don't make me yawn.
>
>       As for Star Wars, I agree with Sean - IMO it's the most
>overrated film of all time - I loved it when I was a kid, but when
>I saw the new editions as an adult I realised how shoddy they were
>- it was comparable to watching the A-Team again after 20 years
>and realising that it was aimed at people with tiny little brains
>(ie children)
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: matrix313 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 6:35 PM
>       To: Cyclone Wehner; 313 Detroit
>       Subject: Re: (313) Techno Films
>
>
>       sean "I just dont *get* Star Wars at all" deason
>
>###################################################################
>##################
>       Note:
>
>       Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do
>not necessarily represent
>       those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless
>specifically stated. This email
>       and any files transmitted are confidential and intended
>solely for the use of the
>       individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you
>have received this email in
>       error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>       Thank You.
>
>###################################################################
>##################
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to