tim-
not to step on your toes, but i've promoted shows in detroit with both
derrick and kevin, often with good results, but not always.

my point was just that 'aclaim' is only worth a few beans

i do agree that from a state promotions stand-point, their work on
movement does deserve acknowledgement



On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Steward, Tim wrote:

> Here in Detroit they can both pack the club...
>
> Their names were added to the list basically due
> to the impact the movement festival had on the city
> this year for their involvement. It wasn't anything
> negatively against Juan.
>
> And if the club isn't packed it's not the DJ/artists
> fault it's the promoters. If you properly promote a
> a gig and put together a nice lineup you will pack
> the house. The scene here in Detroit does not compare
> to others, the mentality of the Detroiters is partly
> to blame, and I can say that since I am a Detroiter.
>
> -Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 1:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: Re: (313) May & Saunderson Win Awards
>
>
> derrick and kevin can get all the awards and alcolaides they can fit on
> their shelves. that doesn't change the fact that there's only a 50/50
> chance of them filling any club they decide to play in detroit (or the
> whole country for that matter).
>
> they still have to travel overseas to earn a living. so i don't see how
> 'acclaim' transfers into anything else, like sucess or stability.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > >While techno has been embraced by the European masses since the late
> '80s,
> > it's only been in the past five years >that the men who most people credit
> > as the godfathers of the music have won broad acclaim in their hometown
> >
> > Just out of interest, do people from detroit feel they have broad acclaim
> > in their hometown now?
> > _________________________________________________________________
> >
> > --------------------- End of message text --------------------
> >
> > This e-mail is sent by the above named in their
> > individual, non-business capacity and is not on
> > behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers.
> >
> > PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming
> > e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and
> > telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you
> > give your consent to such monitoring
> >
> >
>
>
>
> The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It
> contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named
> addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose
> it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately
> and then destroy it.
>
>

Reply via email to