I think its basicly down to the money it would cost to take, say, HTFR's, to court. It would not be worth it for the artist, because of the samll amount they would get back if they won...
But not 100% on that -----Original Message----- From: Odeluga, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 June 2005 10:41 To: Placid; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313 Subject: RE: (313) virtual sex lp repressed! ACTUALLY IT'S BEEN BOOTLEGGED, BURN THE BOOTLEGGERS So the next question is are the artists doing anything about it? Does anyone know? Ken Odeluga Copy Editor, Markets - Market Talk Dow Jones Newswires 10 Fleet Place Limeburner Lane LONDON EC4M 7QN 020 7842 9297 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Placid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 June 2005 10:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313 Subject: Re: (313) virtual sex lp repressed! ACTUALLY IT'S BEEN BOOTLEGGED, BURN THE BOOTLEGGERS as they seem to be bootlegging every rare detroit track under the sun, and even inventing new titles aswell..it is an educated guess that it is the oily weasels from brum behind it. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>Is the Buzz series of represses a bootlegging operation or not? >> >> > >looks like it to me. > >*puts 50 pound on the nose for it to turn out to be HTFR from Birmingham* > >the snidey, thieving, even making a bad job of it, brummy fools. > >come on, these are AWFUL. Scanned in sleeves, poor quality pressings. Plain >rip off by thieves. Ugh. > > >_________________________________________________________________ >--------------------- End of message text -------------------- > >This e-mail is sent by the above named in >their individual, non-business capacity and >is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. > >PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor >outgoing and incoming e-mails and other >telecommunications on its e-mail and >telecommunications systems. By replying >to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring. > > > >
