Hey why don't you do that anyway? I believe you but I'd like to see it! Maybe you could post up a url.
Ken Ken Odeluga Copy Editor, Markets - Market Talk Dow Jones Newswires 10 Fleet Place Limeburner Lane LONDON EC4M 7QN 020 7842 9297 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: "Güclüer, Hansi" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 June 2005 10:55 To: robin; 313 Subject: SV: (313) UR - Amazon i agree that rough edits and "jazz"-type unexpected stuff is great but amazon is not one of those is it??? it's sounds like a proper (magnetic tape)drop-out i'm gonna record it to the computer and show you all the waveform if you don't believe me!!! ;-) -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: to 2005-06-30 11:23 Till: 313 Kopia: Ämne: Re: (313) UR - Amazon Odeluga, Ken wrote: >>Quite a few releases from the Submerge labels have > > missing beats, reversed bars, etc., partly because they > sound cool and partly, I think, because the idea is you > have to know the records to mix them properly :) > > Fred > > *** > > ... break-downs which end too early or too late, et al ... it's all > good, imo. yeah i think a lot of the time this was sloppy edits but as time has gone on and the process has become more digital (ie. not splicing tapes etc for the edits) i think some roughness is left in to give character. i know if i'm ever editting something leaving a certain looseness is nice on the ear. robin...
