I wasn't really disagreeing Jason but hasn't he said no to the radio
thing or have I got hold of the wrong end of the stick? I was merely
pointing out that I could understand why he'd/probably say no...
On 23 Nov 2005, at 08:39, Jason Brunton wrote:
Mike personally doesn't give two hoots about being on Radio One but he
has a lot of mouths to feed and the main reason for this tour is to
help feed those mouths and increase general public perception of UR-
he DOES care about those people and so I can't see any reason why he
would veto or morally object to a radio broacast of this kind- if
Mike was doing things on his own terms for this tour then
A: it would never happen because he hates touring
and
B: He would be playing at Club 69, T-Funkshun, Traffic and other
small clubs across the world and not meat markets like The Arches,
Shine etc etc
cheers
Jason
On 22 Nov 2005, at 16:14, Martin Dust wrote:
On 22 Nov 2005, at 15:59, Dan Bean wrote:
True, but not everyone can get to Liverpool + a Breezeblock session
would introduce them to a new (and v. young) audience.
Whether you think they should be reaching a wider audience is
another story, though my impression is that UR themselves wish to do
so.
Mike does things on his own terms as far as I can tell and probably
wouldn't give two sh1ts about being on Radio 1...
m
