Dan knows... (I don't think he's said no outright. Isn't the possible appearance simply being pushed back till sometime next year?)
-----Original Message----- From: Martin Dust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 November 2005 11:18 To: Jason Brunton Cc: 313 Mailinglist List Subject: Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR I wasn't really disagreeing Jason but hasn't he said no to the radio thing or have I got hold of the wrong end of the stick? I was merely pointing out that I could understand why he'd/probably say no... On 23 Nov 2005, at 08:39, Jason Brunton wrote: > Mike personally doesn't give two hoots about being on Radio One but he > has a lot of mouths to feed and the main reason for this tour is to > help feed those mouths and increase general public perception of UR- > he DOES care about those people and so I can't see any reason why he > would veto or morally object to a radio broacast of this kind- if > Mike was doing things on his own terms for this tour then > > A: it would never happen because he hates touring > > and > > B: He would be playing at Club 69, T-Funkshun, Traffic and other > small clubs across the world and not meat markets like The Arches, > Shine etc etc > > cheers > > Jason > > On 22 Nov 2005, at 16:14, Martin Dust wrote: > >> >> On 22 Nov 2005, at 15:59, Dan Bean wrote: >> >> >>> True, but not everyone can get to Liverpool + a Breezeblock session >>> would introduce them to a new (and v. young) audience. >>> >>> Whether you think they should be reaching a wider audience is >>> another story, though my impression is that UR themselves wish to do >>> so. >>> >> >> Mike does things on his own terms as far as I can tell and probably >> wouldn't give two sh1ts about being on Radio 1... >> >> m >> >> >
