no, that's what you should be doing
slacker.
----- Original Message -----
From: "/0" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "fab." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "list 313" <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: (313) re: production
of boobies
----- Original Message -----
From: "fab." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "list 313" <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 5:08 AM
Subject: Re: (313) re: production
before the advent of (cheap) digital photography we would write down all
the parameters and make little sketches of the settings.
now we just take snapshots with our cam phones :P
f.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Dust" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Brunton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "list 313" <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: (313) re: production
On 1 Sep 2006, at 09:35, Jason Brunton wrote:
Sshhhh- you'll get Tom going again- remember he's one of the all
important 0.1% minority aka The Underground :)
Jason
I don't think there's anything wrong with it Jason, Ken endlessly bangs
on about "the difference" between digital and analogue - there are
differences in the sound but the "beef" for me with a lot of the old
stuff we use is that it's totally unpredictable, the sound changes based
on a "number of factors" and it's not fun after getting some sleep to
return to the kit and find it's changed...
m
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/435 - Release Date:
31/08/2006
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/435 - Release Date: 31/08/2006
