Why is it that when I make a good solid argument it somehow becomes pointless... and then the reason isn't even backed up with anything else that is solid? It's like the decision was made long ago, and when the logic is at point blank range it still isn't acknowledged.
There are a bunch of may-as-well-be-5-years-olds who never touched a keyboard, and they are not even aware of what a waveform is at all. They will turn on their computers, install some so-called 'music software' and make complete s#!%.
It's not pointless because you are insulting every truly creative person that uses a computer because of the people that aren't using it creatively.... the baby and the bath water analogy... I'm here in their defense to tell you why I believe that you are wrong.
Errr... I mean, this is pointless. At 04:49 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote:
sweet f****ng jesus ;/ "In a computer it is the same thing, there are a lot of elements that are geared to that same mainstream audience, as well as all of those garbage loop and prefab rhythm programs/plug-ins, and you have to get past that just like with real world synths and make your own sounds. You have to make them your own. A good artist will synth and tweak every sound in their production themselves and have total control.... " ^that's ok when you start the topic with a bunch of 5 year-olders who never touched a keyboard..& who are not aware of what sort of waveforms surround them ;/ etc. as you probably noticed - this is not the case.. cliche aside.. or let's end the discussion before it reaches new levels of pointlessness* /12
