Claude Young has put one to good use as well.
-nick
Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
no, the correct name is the Notron sequencer, made by Latronic.
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/1997_articles/jun97/latronicnorton.html
it is hardware and very dope.
regardless, KDG does have the tendency to overproduce his stuff. he
can easily get into some lite jazz territory, especially recently. i
do recall reading an interview with him where he said he multitracked
all his stuff in protools now. which is one reason why his stuff seems
so eh at times........
in fact, here are his gearlists for different times in his production:
http://www.kirkdegiorgio.com/pdfs/kirkdiscog.pdf
he's a case of analogue out the wazoo, but i still dont care.
tom
On 9/4/06, Ralf Gill (healthAlliance) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Ignore that, the neutron is a plug in...i thought it was an outboard
step sequencer...
-----Original Message-----
From: Ralf Gill (healthAlliance) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 5 September 2006 5:07 a.m.
To: Odeluga, Ken; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Laptop Debate
This was from discogs... " Even if DeGeorgio recognizes that he resorted
to a unique sequencer, the Neutron, to reproduce the modal variations
characterizing his musical inspirations "
...i guess he'd have trouble making his music on a laptop then?
-----Original Message-----
From: Odeluga, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 4 September 2006 10:04 p.m.
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Laptop Debate
-----Original Message-----
From: Klaas-Jan Jongsma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 September 2006 10:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Laptop Debate
Yeah i can remember seeing a gearlist in some article and it is
definitely a gearjunkies wetdream, oh and he has this:
http://www.kirkdegiorgio.com/ModcanB.htm
Now this reminds me of something I've thought for a while ...
I like Kirk a lot - he's the same age as me so he must be a good egg (!)
Plus he's one of the people I challenge myself with to see if he's ever
made a bad record. I certainly don't own any duffers by him. Problem is
- despite the fact that my record collection is peppered with his
releases from year dot, I'm not sure I can hear the spell-binding
difference in the sounds he comes up with, with that rig and the sounds
that it's possible to get from a mid-range analog/digital synth. I just
can't. I still like the last 3 LPs though, so don't get me wrong, but I
just think he could have saved himself some money or something! Just mo.
Having said that, it does illustrate that this software vs. hardware
debate currently raging is not really a 'new paradigm' problem. The same
debates could be heard between advocates and detractors of acoustic vs.
amplified, synths vs. guitars, and naturally, modular versus stand-alone
(or whatever they're called.)
So long as you know that such debates are usually futile, I guess they
can be fun and instructive.
K
This e-mail message and any accompanying attachments may contain
information that is confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you
are not the intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate,
distribute or copy this message or attachments. If you have received
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
this message.
This e-mail message and any accompanying attachments may contain
information that is confidential and subject to legal privilege. If
you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate,
distribute or copy this message or attachments. If you have received
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete this message.
