Really? I think US flyers are still somewhat stuck in this era while UK flyer design is much better now.
Freak Mode party looks like it would have been great: Russ Gabriel, DBX, Ectomorph (live), Rotator, Will Webb, Taj Bell another good looking line-up is Gear: Spacetime Continuum, Autechre, Mark Broom, Stacey Pullen, Eric Haupt... 1996 - good vintage MEK "Robert Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/11/2008 07:32:18 AM: > Yeah, there's not much difference between the UK and the US in flyer > design - strange, cos in other graphic design areas they are are poles > apart > > > Rob Taylor > VT Librarian > x8599 > Hatch Desk x1088 > VT Library Users' Guide > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 January 2008 13:22 > To: Robert Taylor; /0; 313@hyperreal.org > Subject: RE: (313) detroit party flyers > > it's funny how some of them look like flyers from big uk raves like > Fantazia. > > this collection almost looks like a timeline of graphic design though, > wich is pretty cool.... > > ----- Original Message ----- > Da : "Robert Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> A : "/0" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <313@hyperreal.org> Oggetto : RE: (313) > detroit party flyers Data : Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:57:05 -0000 > > > Why is techno design often so lame? > > It's all Chesley Bonestall rip-offs and dreadful typefaces Still, it's > > > nice looking at the old line-ups > > > > > > Rob Taylor > > VT Librarian > > x8599 > > Hatch Desk x1088 > > VT Library Users' Guide > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: /0 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 11 January 2008 11:34 > > To: 313@hyperreal.org > > Subject: (313) detroit party flyers > > > > http://onlyndetroit.com/html/rave/raveyears/1995.htm > > > > some memories here. > > > > also, did anyone on the list mention the "new" metro area? > > I think its terrible, but Im sure most of you love it. > > i'm curious > > > > > > ########################################################## > > ########################### Note: > > > > Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not > > necessarily represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation > > unless specifically stated. This email and any files transmitted are > > confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or > > entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in > > > error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Thank You. > > > > Channel Four Television Corporation, created by statute under English > > law, is at 124 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 2TX . > > > > 4 Ventures Limited (Company No. 04106849), incorporated in England and > > > Wales has its registered office at 124 Horseferry Road, London SW1P > > 2TX. > > > > VAT no: GB 626475817 > > > > ########################################################## > > ########################### > ##################################################################################### > Note: > > Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not > necessarily represent > those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically > stated. This email > and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for > the use of the > individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have > received this email in > error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thank You. > > Channel Four Television Corporation, created by statute under > English law, is at 124 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 2TX . > > 4 Ventures Limited (Company No. 04106849), incorporated in England > and Wales has its registered office at 124 Horseferry Road, London SW1P 2TX. > > VAT no: GB 626475817 > > #####################################################################################
