this is perhaps the most irrelevant post made so far in this ultimately asinine argument.
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:47 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yeah, but how many people know what Mojo even looks like? > most photos I've seen his face has been in the shadows > > MEK > > "Frank Glazer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/21/2008 03:06:03 PM: > >> on second thought, it's not that i'm against pedestals, i think it's >> pretty silly to put kraftwerk on an imaginary mount rushmore of >> detroit techno. i say put mojo up there, which, in effect, includes >> kraftwerk, amongst other influences. in everything i've read on the >> subject, kraftwerk has only been listed as one of many influences, >> almost always sourced through mojo. heck, i think prince is more >> important to detroit techno than kraftwerk is!!! >> >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Frank Glazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> > maybe. >> > >> > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Matt Kane's Brain >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Frank Glazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >>> enh. whatever. i am so tired of this argument. i don't see why >> >>> everybody is so passionately for putting kraftwerk on such a high >> >>> pedestal. they're just one band. >> >> >> >> It sounds more like you are skeptical of the utility of pedestals, >> >> period. After all, we are just people. In that case, why should we >> >> care what you think? And why should you care about what any of us >> >> thinks? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> matt kane's brain >> >> biweekly techno radio at: http://hydrogenproject.com http://wzbc.org >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > peace, >> > >> > frank >> > >> > dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> peace, >> >> frank >> >> dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com > > -- peace, frank dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com
