> Le 15 janv. 2017 à 18:31, Kirk Brooks <lists.k...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > [...] > > I'm thinking thousands+ of elements but maybe it's a noticeable bump on > smaller ones?
I put some test code under. It seems the position of the value to search (lines with *) seems to strongly influence the result. In the middle, sorted array is faster about 1000 items. ARRAY TEXT($item_at;0) $factor_l:=100 //vary here $lorem_t:=Str_loremIpsum (500)*$factor_l //returns a suite of words… Str_explode (->$item_at;$lorem_t;" ") //words to array SORT ARRAY($item_at;>) $soa_l:=Size of array($item_at) //$whereToFind_l:=$soa_l\$factor_l //* value to search near to an end $whereToFind_l:=$soa_l\2 //* value to search in the middle $val_t:=$item_at{$whereToFind_l} $ticks_l:=Tickcount+(60*5) ARRAY LONGINT($ms_al;2) $ms_al{1}:=0 $ms_al{2}:=0 Repeat $ms_l:=Milliseconds $z:=Find in array($item_at;$val_t) $ms_al{1}:=$ms_al{1}+(Milliseconds-$ms_l) $ms_l:=Milliseconds $z:=Find in array sorted($item_at;$val_t;>;$star_t;$end_t) $ms_al{2}:=$ms_al{2}+(Milliseconds-$ms_l) Until (Tickcount>$ticks_l) TRACE //read result, influence of $factor_l, -- Arnaud de Montard ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com **********************************************************************