Either way works for me. I’m happy with Lorenzo’s code. I’m also happy to have with this and a ”pure garbage” return code, if folks find useful to make that distinction. Comments?
Pascal From: Lorenzo Colitti [mailto:lore...@google.com] Sent: jeudi 20 avril 2017 12:03 To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthub...@cisco.com> Cc: Erik Nordmark <nordm...@sonic.net>; Christian Huitema <huit...@huitema.net>; Brian Haberman <br...@innovationslab.net>; 6lo@ietf.org Subject: Re: [6lo] Draft applicability for 6775bis I think so. the unspecified address is certainly not topologically correct because it's not in the right /64. In general, random garbage has only one chance in 2^64 of being topologically correct. :-) On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthub...@cisco.com<mailto:pthub...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hello Lorenzo: Say the user registers, say, unspecified, is “Address topologically incorrect” the right thing? I can add that code, but how do you return that the requester asks for pure garbage? Take care, Pascal From: Lorenzo Colitti [mailto:lore...@google.com<mailto:lore...@google.com>] Sent: jeudi 20 avril 2017 11:55 To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthub...@cisco.com<mailto:pthub...@cisco.com>> Cc: Erik Nordmark <nordm...@sonic.net<mailto:nordm...@sonic.net>>; Christian Huitema <huit...@huitema.net<mailto:huit...@huitema.net>>; Brian Haberman <br...@innovationslab.net<mailto:br...@innovationslab.net>>; 6lo@ietf.org<mailto:6lo@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [6lo] Draft applicability for 6775bis On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 1:15 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthub...@cisco.com<mailto:pthub...@cisco.com>> wrote: I also removed the administrative rejection, the return codes are now as follows: [...] | 8 | Invalid Registered Address: The address being registered | | | is not usable on this link, e.g. it is not topologically | | | correct | As worded, it's not clear to me how this option is substantially different from the administrative rejection option. Could it be scoped more tightly, e.g., renamed to "Address topologically incorrect"?
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo