Hi, > So each MAC/PHY needs its own considerations when it comes to an > adaptation layer. My feeling is that many concepts could be abstracted > and maybe written in a common document
in my opinion that's an interesting point. Why not writing a more generic document specifying IPv6 over low-power wireless? This could cover more common considerations about the requirements to the link layer for new 6lowpan implementations. For instance we've implemented 6lowpan [1] for our micro kernel based operating system which currently supports MSP430 as well as an ARM7. But as our transceiver (TI CC110x) is neither capable of 802.15.4 nor bt-le at the physical layer we cannot be RFC compliant. Therefore, a more generic specification for IPv6 over low-power wireless foo would be really interesting for us - and probably a lot of other people as CC1020 and CC110x are very popular transceivers for WSN. Regards Oleg [1] For clarification: we have implemented RFC4944, current ND and HC as well as the 802.15.4 frame format based on CSMA for sub-GHz band. _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
