Hi All, I definitely push the idea of a "generic IPv6 over low power foo" specification (if achievable). IPv6 may be used over various low power media, and if a generic adaptation layer can be designed, this may avoid to write a specification fo each low power media (exiting and to appear) that use IPv6. By the way, low power media cannot be restricted to wireless media. We also have to consider wired media (like low power PLC currentlty specified in IEEE P1901.2) as they shared many requirements with well known LoWPAN technologies.
Cédric. -----Message d'origine----- De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Carsten Bormann Envoyé : lundi 4 avril 2011 22:05 À : Oliver Hahm Cc : [email protected] Objet : Re: [6lowpan] WG adoption of draft-patil-6lowpan-v6over-btle-01.txt On Apr 1, 2011, at 19:40, Oliver Hahm wrote: > Therefore, a more generic specification for IPv6 over low-power wireless foo > would be really interesting for us - and probably a lot of other people as > CC1020 and CC110x are very popular transceivers for WSN. I think that is an interesting idea. How much of such a specification could be generic and how much would need to be specific to each of the radios? Can you describe the decisions you had to take in applying 6LoWPAN to these radios? And, even better, can you write a draft? Gruesse, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
