Great. So we can close this e-mail thread then.
Thanks

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Prof. Diego Dujovne <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Thomas,
>              During the last Webex I commented that
> I used these comments to modify and correct
> the draft. I eliminated (almost) every instance of
> "effectively used cell" and fixed the problems
> raised by Randy.
> Regards,
>
>                           Diego
>
> 2017-03-28 9:31 GMT-03:00 Thomas Watteyne <[email protected]>:
>
>> @Diego, @Authors,
>> Any comments?
>> Thomas
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Yasuyuki Tanaka <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Nice comments!
>>>
>>> I also want to see the definition of "effectively used cell" and
>>> how to calculate PDR.
>>>
>>> In addition, I don't think that we would count the number of
>>> cells used for 6P in terms of SF0. Is it correct? In any case,
>>> some text on how SF0 should handle traffic or cell usage by 6P
>>> would be helpful.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Yatch
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2017/03/05 11:20, Randy Turner wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> After reading the current SF0 document, I had a few nits that I thought
>>>> I would pass along - hope they’re helpful.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Section 2: Introduction
>>>>
>>>> (The Scheduling Algorithm)
>>>>
>>>> “…under effective use…”   the choice of wording seems unorthodox.
>>>>
>>>> Suggest the following  “A portion of these allocated cells will be
>>>> effectively utilized by neighbors, while the remaining cells can be
>>>> over-provisioned to handle unanticipated increases in cell requirements”
>>>>
>>>> (The Relocation Algorithm)
>>>>
>>>> “Allocated cells may experiment packet loss” should be “Allocated cells
>>>> may experience packet loss…”
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Section 4: SF0 Triggering Events
>>>>
>>>> 1. “…change in the current number of used cells”  - could this be
>>>> paraphrased to say “…a change in the number of required cells”  ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Section 5: SF0 Estimation Algorithm
>>>>
>>>> The Cell Estimation Algorithm steps, # 2 - What is an “effectively”
>>>> used cell?  Could this just say “Collect the current number of used cells” 
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> There is actually quite a bit of emphasis in this document on the idea
>>>> of an “effectively used cell” - perhaps we should explain the concept of an
>>>> effectively used cell (or a reference if it’s already defined) - I was
>>>> curious why the term “effective” is used so often?  In the “Cell Estimation
>>>> Algorithm” Step #2, the text reads:
>>>> “Collect the current number of effectively used cells” — which would
>>>> seem to imply that ineffectively used cells wouldn’t be included in this
>>>> step.  This may seem a too literal interpretation, I’m just looking for
>>>> clarity as to whether or not the term “effective” or “effectively” is
>>>> really needed in the doc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Section 11: Relocating Cells
>>>>
>>>> Just for completeness, I would emphasize how PDR is calculated, or
>>>> include a reference to some other document if defined elsewhere
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for this work!
>>>> Randy
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> 6tisch mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 6tisch mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> _______________________________________
>>
>> Thomas Watteyne, PhD
>> Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria
>> Sr Networking Design Eng, Linear Tech
>> Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN
>> Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH
>>
>> www.thomaswatteyne.com
>> _______________________________________
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 6tisch mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> DIEGO DUJOVNE
> Profesor Asociado
> Escuela de Informática y Telecomunicaciones
> Facultad de Ingeniería - Universidad Diego Portales - Chile
> www.ingenieria.udp.cl
> (56 2) 676 8125
>



-- 
_______________________________________

Thomas Watteyne, PhD
Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria
Sr Networking Design Eng, Linear Tech
Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN
Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH

www.thomaswatteyne.com
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to