On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 15:09 -0500, erik quanstrom wrote: > > It would be a shame (but no disaster) if Binutil's "nm" and other > > tools could not at least display native Plan 9 intermediate files. I > > need to know or decide how far to take this exercise. > > why would that be advantagous on plan 9? if you teach > gcc to output, e.g., 8.out, then what is gained by having > gnu binutils version of nm?
Not *on* Plan9, but *for* Plan9: think cross-environment. Thanks, Roman.
