On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Eris Discordia <eris.discor...@gmail.com> wrote: > I see. But seriously, readline does handle bindings and line editing for > bash. Except it's a function instead of a program and you think it's a bad > idea.
The man page *does* say it's too big and slow. So does the bash manpage. And getting readline to do anything sane is about as fun as screwing around with a terminfo file. > > --On Tuesday, April 07, 2009 10:31 PM +0800 sqweek <sqw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2009/4/7 Eris Discordia <eris.discor...@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>> Keyboard >>>>> bindings for example; why couldn't they be handled by a program that >>>>> just does keyboard bindings + line editing, and writes finalized lines >>>>> to the shell. >>> >>> Like... readline(3)? >> >> No. >> -sqweek >> > > > > --On Tuesday, April 07, 2009 8:09 AM -0700 ron minnich <rminn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Eris Discordia >> <eris.discor...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Like... readline(3)? >> >> one hopes not. >> >> ron >> > > > > > >
