On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:39 PM, ron minnich <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:06 PM, J.R. Mauro <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yeah, the problem's bigger than I thought (not surprising since I >> didn't think much about it). I'm having a hard time figuring out how >> Condor handles these issues. All I can see from the documentation is >> that it gives you warnings. > > the original condor just forwarded system calls back to the node it > was started from. Thus all system calls were done in the context of > the originating node and user.
"Best effort" is a good place to start. > > >> But this still has the 90% problem you mentioned. > > it's just plain harder than it looks ... Yeah. Every time I think of a way to address the corner cases, new ones crop up.
