I forgot this: Graham basically accuses programmers who don't find LISP as attractive (or powerful, as he puts it) as he does of living on lower planes of existence from which the "heavens above" of functional (or only LISP) programming seem incomprehensible. He writes/speaks persuasively, he's a successful businessman, but is he also an honest debater?

--On Saturday, September 05, 2009 12:02 +0100 Richard Miller <9f...@hamnavoe.com> wrote:

One serious question today would be: what's LISP _really_ good for?

http://www.paulgraham.com/avg.html







Reply via email to