I don't think erik was suggesting a rewrite, just improving it… btw, in case anyone cares, I'm with richard on this.
On Jan 8, 2013, at 5:54 PM, Matthew Veety <mve...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> the current usb stack can't do some things it needs to be able to >> do. it's particularly terrible at dealing with devices with scheduling >> requirements. and it doesn't handle xhci. >> >> - erik >> > > Well can't we just fix the problems with the current one? Most of the work is > already done. I don't see why we can't just use that. --- Federico G. Benavento benave...@gmail.com
