I was thinking of using Cygwin to see would be capable of compiling p9p. Chris
> On Jul 27, 2016, at 9:08 PM, Andrew Simmons <kod...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What the subject line says. > > This is not remotely intended to disrespect Sean Quinlan’s 9pm, or the guys > who did pf9. I’m just asking because there are still chunks of p9p that I’d > like to have under Windows. Some of the chunks I want (mostly the command > line utilities, also sam, not so much acme) I’ve managed to build under > Microsoft Visual Studio (note to self - wash mouth out and learn to eschew > IDEs and love mk ((also, sub-note to self, don’t use syntax highlighting))) > > But, and this is a large but, there are parts of p9port that seem to be > dependent on the Unix world - unix pipes for one, the stuff about sigjmp for > another. > > So, what the subject line says, but also - how much of the Unix-specific > stuff in the current p9p is essential to a port to Windows? > > Go in peace > James V Choate XXXVI > > >
