eh? you speak russian. ;-)
no. the unicode sequences (e.g. U+0069 U+0361) are correct.
i checked this and several other examples with the actual books.
i think you misunderstand how unicode works. a base cp
like U+0069 followed by a combining cp like U+0361
make a single character. this identification is called "composition".
unicode contains some precomposed cps, but not U+0069 U+0361.
if you think this makes unicode bizarre, then join the club. but
it does not mean that U+0069 U+0361 is an invalid unicode sequence
which represents a single character.
- erik
On Fri May 19 18:41:24 CDT 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 05:35:10PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > the thing you're missing is that there is no precombined form
> > of {X+combining double breve} for any roman letter X that i know of.
> > this means that most utf renderers will give you either "X?" or ?.
>
> Well, but the language in question is Russian. In Russian, both of
> the symbols which can be seen as compound are unique symbols.
>
> Of course, that only means, that whoever was entering the title
> into the system made a mistake in using wrong unicode.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
