On 4/27/07, Charles Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>_Bool is a notational convenience, maybe helping document functions
>returning only pass/fail status, or for the isalpha(2) family of
>functions.
no, since its type is different from that produced by the logical
and equality operators (eg, ! and ==) which are still int!
it's a unsigned integer type with a limited range (0 or 1), a special
conversion rule, and of course a peculiar name (not even _bool!).
pointless tinkering.
Since we're complaining about stuff being standardized to death...
consider the entire tgmath.h header which actually can't be
implemented in legal C99... yet is a part of C99. That one's a real
twister...
