> > i thought venti was only read, not written, except during a fossil archive > dump, > so it should only be vulnerable during that interval > (which might be large just after file system initialisation).
my impression was it was caching. - erik
> > i thought venti was only read, not written, except during a fossil archive > dump, > so it should only be vulnerable during that interval > (which might be large just after file system initialisation).
my impression was it was caching. - erik