Toby Rider wrote:
|
|  Why is it that there are so many musicians that are either computer
| people or engineers? I've been playing music of one form or another since
| I was in elementary school and I'm noticing a definate pattern here.. I
| recently spoke to some of the guys who were part of my most successful
| rock-and-roll band in high school.. 3 out of the 4 of them turned out to
| be either computer people or engineers..
|  They have more piercings and tatoos then I do, but other then that, we're
| in similiar lines of work. :-)

Lots of people have noticed this.  And the pattern goes back  a  long
ways.   One  of  the  anecdotes I read a few years ago was that Georg
Telemann was a science/enginerring student at college.  But  he  paid
his  way  by playing keyboards for local churches and special events.
He also tried his hand at composing.  He was so  successful  at  this
that  after  he  graduated, he decided to ignore his technical degree
and become a professional musician.  He was, of course,  one  of  the
most successful musicians of the early 1700's.

For a talented musician, such a decision could have been sensible  up
until sometime in the early 1900's. Then, during the 1930's and 40's,
something changed.  The recording industry arose.  By 1950, it was no
longer  rational  to attempt to make a living as a musician, at least
in Europe and North America.  To be a successful musician, you had to
make  recordings,  and  the recording industry had arranged things so
that the musicians didn't profit from recordings.  The oligopoly gave
you  no  choice but to sign contracts that gave them ownership of the
music and the recordings, with only a pittance to the musicians.  All
but the top 3 or 4 in any genre usually lost money.

When I was in college, in the 60's, I understood this quite well. But
like  a lot of other kids, I did well in math and science, and when I
was able to get my hands on computers (or punch cards, back then ;-),
I decided that nobody in their right mind would become a musician.  I
graduated from college with exactly the same  number  of  credits  in
math and music.  And of course I went into computers.

Since I was part of the computer crowd that was as interested in  how
computers  got their data as with what they did with the data, I went
into communications at an early stage, and naturally ended up part of
the  gang  that brought the Internet to the world.  I've noticed that
Internet programmers are always amateur musicians.  You have to  look
really  hard  to  find  even one that doesn't have an instrument that
they play regularly.  (Those are all folk dancers.)

If the recording industry hadn't been so greedy, and had  shared  the
money  with  the  musicians,  most  of  the Internet crowd would have
become musicians, and the Internet would still  be  an  academic  toy
that  nobody  else  had  ever  heard  of.  But the recording industry
blocked us all from our preferred occupation and forced us to  become
computer geeks.  Now they're gonna pay for it.

Our plan, of course, is to do to the recording industry what they did
to us. If the plan succeeds, there will be no more profit for the fat
cats who control the distribution channels.  The business of  selling
recordings  will  die  in  the  same way that the business of playing
music for a living died.  And we won't feel sorry for them.

There will still be lots of recordings, of course.  But  now  all  it
takes  is  a  few  thousand  bucks  to set up your own studio, making
recordings, and selling them over the Net.  I know a bunch  of  guys,
all  computer geeks, who are doing this on the side, and they are all
seriously thinking of quitting their day jobs and  going  into  music
production full time.

For a startup band, it no longer makes sense to deal with  the  music
industry.  You'll lose money, even if your recordings are successful.
But there are local computer guys who can put your music online.  You
can't  make  a lot of money by selling music online, but you can make
some, and the money will mostly go to the musicians.   You  can  sell
recordings online. You can put tunes online in abc form, and get some
royalties if others want to use them. And you don't have to sign your
rights away to anyone.

For a nice example, look at:
  http://www.cranfordpub.com/
This site is run by a bunch of musicians,  to  distribute  their  own
music.  My ABC Tune Finder has included a lot of their tunes from the
start.  This sort of site is starting  to  pop  up  all  over.   It's
probably the musical future for most of us.

This sort of site is a real threat to the recording industry, and  is
really what the "music piracy" fuss is all about.  Their main goal is
to take control of the Internet and put distribution  back  into  the
hands  of  the oligopoly.  The Internet can't be killed, but there is
still a chance that it can be made illegal for you and me to put  our
own stuff online. If they can do this, they can then force us to sign
over our rights to our own stuff to get it  online,  and  they'll  be
back in the saddle.

But they'll probably fail.  They're trying to take over a system that
was  built by the very musicians that they put out of business.  They
woke up too late and don't really understand what  they're  fighting.
But their musical computer-geek opponents understand it very well.


(Does this qualify as sufficiently funny to be a musical joke? ;-)

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

Reply via email to